Site
News
Files Visual Basic
Strings
Math
General
Properties
Memory
Methods Search
Testing Inline ASM-VB
Strings
Math
General
Memory Search
Using inline ASM
Submit!
News
Files Visual Basic
Strings
Math
General
Properties
Memory
Methods Search
Testing Inline ASM-VB
Strings
Math
General
Memory Search
Using inline ASM
Submit!
Use "X 1" instead of "Cint(x)""X 1" is a lot faster, and the end result is the same.
The speed increase is actually more than I would have expected.
But as with many other optimizations, this test has been done with 500.000 iterations.
So for small loops you might not notice it.
User contributed notes:
Code: |
CInt(x) % faster than x 1 | CInt(x) (sec) | x 1 (sec) |
40,5% | 0,035031 | 0,024938 |
17,7% | 0,027812 | 0,023638 |
14% | 0,026613 | 0,023351 |
43,8% | 0,034486 | 0,023985 |
7,5% | 0,026673 | 0,024821 |
User contributed notes:
Author: VBBR () | Date: 22:03 31/03/2004 |
I think the idea here is to show the difference between CInt and x \ 1, right? But it says "x 1" instead of "x \ 1"... | |
Author: PRoPHEZZoR (prophezzor at hackermail dot com) | Date: 14:04 04/04/2004 |
In PHP the \\ doesn't show, homie... | |
Author: Tom (hurendo_kun at hotmail dot com) | Date: 15:06 08/06/2005 |
Your results are exacerbated because you're doing two type conversions. You should be using CLng(). | |
Author: TheShau (shauros at walla dot com) | Date: 14:08 04/08/2006 |
I'm seeing the same efficiency gain with CLng. |